spinner

Uttarakhand High Court Sets 3-Month Deadline for State to Appoint Lokayukta

Last Updated: 2023-08-28 15:09:06
Uttarakhand High Court Sets 3-Month Deadline for State to Appoint Lokayukta

"Uttarakhand High Court's Mandate: State Ordered to Name Lokayukta in Three-Month Window"

The Uttarakhand High Court has issued a significant directive to the state government, compelling it to appoint a Lokayukta within the next three months. According to reliable sources, the court's ruling also encompasses a stipulation that individuals employed in the Lokayukta's office must withhold their salaries until the crucial position of the anti-corruption watchdog is satisfactorily filled.

A bench presided over by Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Rakesh Thapliyal reportedly formulated these instructions. Moreover, the court has granted the government the flexibility to assign tasks from alternate departments to these employees and subsequently compensate them accordingly.

The impetus for this legal development was a plea asserting that substantial financial resources are being expended on the Lokayukta's office, all the while the position itself remains vacant for an extended duration. This plea notably underscored the existing circumstance where all investigative bodies within the state are under direct governmental control.

Notably, the plea accentuated the existing void in Uttarakhand's legal framework, wherein no empowered investigative body exists with the authority to initiate corruption inquiries against government officials without securing prior permission from the state administration.

Reports reveal that Uttarakhand has been without a Lokayukta since 2013, following the conclusion of M M Ghildiyal's tenure as the former Lokayukta.

TAGS: Uttarakhand High Court State government appoint Lokayukta three months personnel salaries anti-corruption ombudsman Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi Justice Rakesh Thapliyal directions tasks alternative departments payments plea money expended investigative agencies control corruption case bureaucrat prior permission 2013 M M Ghildiyal.


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...