spinner

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has raised objections to the cohabitation of a married man and a divorced woman, and has ordered them to compensate the man's wife with a sum of ₹25,000.

Last Updated: 2023-09-27 19:45:16
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has raised objections to the cohabitation of a married man and a divorced woman, and has ordered them to compensate the man's wife with a sum of ₹25,000.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently expressed disapproval of a plea for protection submitted by a divorced woman and a married man who were cohabiting.

Justice Alok Jain stated that the man's wife and children were experiencing the negative consequences of the petitioners' unlawful and promiscuous relationship. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and the two petitioners were instructed to pay ₹25,000 to the man's wife.

Justice Jain remarked, "This petition has been filed solely to conceal the petitioners' illicit and promiscuous relationship by misusing and exploiting the legal process."

The divorced woman, aged 49, approached the Court with her partner, a 33-year-old man who was already married to another woman.

The petitioners claimed that the man's wife had visited their residence and caused a disturbance. They further alleged that the wife had defamed the man's partner by making false and baseless accusations in public. The petitioners also stated that they had received threats.

However, upon reviewing the petition, the Court determined that the submissions did not demonstrate any threat to the couple's life and freedom.

Consequently, the Court concluded that the petition lacked merit and dismissed it, ordering the petitioners to pay ₹25,000 to the man's wife.

The payment must be made within four weeks, and the man's wife was instructed to establish a fixed deposit in a nationalized bank in their daughter's name.

Justice Jain had recently declined to grant police protection to another cohabiting couple, noting that one of the individuals involved was married to someone else.

Advocate Chanpreet Singh represented the petitioners in the current case, while Deputy Advocate General PS Grewal represented the State.

Click Here to: Download/View Related File

TAGS: Punjab High Court Haryana High Court Justice Alok Jain Live-in Relationship Petition


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...