spinner

Meghalaya High Court Asserts: Electricity is Essential, State's Obligation to Ensure Ample Availability

Last Updated: 2023-05-17 12:05:37
Meghalaya High Court Asserts: Electricity is Essential, State's Obligation to Ensure Ample Availability Meghalaya High Court Affirms: Electricity a Necessity, State Must Ensure Ample Availability In a recent development, the Meghalaya High Court declared that electricity is no longer a luxury but an essential requirement, placing the responsibility on the government to ensure sufficient availability to its citizens. The observation came during the hearing of a petition highlighting frequent power cuts and arbitrary load-shedding by the State authorities in the case of Flaming B Marak v State of Meghalaya. The division bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice W Diengdoh emphasized that the State must guarantee adequate electricity supply in accordance with the demand, with plans in place to meet future requirements. The respondents revealed that the State's monthly power demand stood at a substantial 200 million units, while the availability was limited to only 88 million units due to the closure of a power plant in Tripura and the absence of an alternative power source. However, the Court pointed out that the State has the option to procure power from the open grid and establish arrangements with power companies operating in the region. The bench clarified that while the State should ensure sufficient electricity availability, the cost should be borne by the citizens. During the proceedings, the Court experienced a power interruption, further underscoring the need for the State to address the issue promptly. The bench directed the State and the Meghalaya Energy Corporation to submit independent affidavits outlining immediate, short-term, and long-term measures, demand projections, contingency plans for power plant shutdowns, and potential alternative sources of energy. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for May 30. Advocate PT Sangma represented the petitioner, while advocates K Khan, AH Kharwanlang, S Shyam, and S Sahay appeared for the respondents. The Court's ruling signifies the significance of uninterrupted electricity supply as a fundamental necessity in the state, placing the onus on the government to ensure its availability.

Click Here to: Download/View Related File

TAGS: Meghalaya High Court electricity luxury government responsibility adequate availability Flaming B Marak v State of Meghalaya power cuts load-shedding Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee Justice W Diengdoh demand power plant alternative source open grid citizens' cost power interruption affidavits demand projections contingency plans alternative sources petitioner respondents advocates May 30.


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...