spinner

Mahua Moitra sues advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai and BJP MP Nishikant Dubey in Delhi High Court for defamation.

Last Updated: 17-10-2023 08:39:59
Mahua Moitra sues advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai and BJP MP Nishikant Dubey in Delhi High Court for defamation.

On Tuesday, Trinamool Congress Member of Parliament (MP) Mahua Moitra filed a defamation suit against Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Nishikant Dubey, Advocate Jai Anant Dehadrai, and various media organizations before the Delhi High Court.

The defendants had alleged that Moitra accepted bribes to ask questions in Parliament. Justice Sachin Datta is expected to hear the case on October 20, Friday.

Dubey and Dehadrai had claimed that Moitra accepted bribes to ask questions in Parliament.

Dubey had written to the Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on Sunday, alleging that Moitra agreed to field questions in Parliament on behalf of business tycoon Darshan Hiranandani in exchange for cash and gifts.

It was claimed that some of these questions were related to the Adani Group, which is a competitor of Hiranandani.

Dubey's complaint stemmed from a letter he received from Dehadrai, who had filed a complaint with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) claiming to have "irrefutable evidence that Moitra took bribes from Hiranandani."

Dehadrai claimed that Moitra gave complete access to her online Lok Sabha account to Hiranandani, who misused the same to post Parliamentary Questions of his liking.

It was claimed that these questions amounted to 50 of the 61 questions Moitra has asked.

Moitra had earlier sent a legal notice to Dubey, Dehadrai, and several media organizations.

The TMC MP denied all the allegations and said that they are false and designed to curry political mileage and to extract a personal vendetta against her.

TAGS: Delhi High Court Mahua Moitra Defamation Cash for queries, Nishikant Dubey


Latest Posts

Calcutta HC extends police shield for slain Congress worker's family amid threats from accused in poll violence.

Calcutta HC extends police shi...

 Madras HC: S.194 CrPC Orders Administrative, Unquestionable Unless Clearly Illegal.

Madras HC: S.194 CrPC Orders ...

 Delhi HC: No summons for non-compliance with Section 31 DV Act maintenance order.

Delhi HC: No summons for non-...

 Bombay HC nullified reassessment on leasehold rights, alleging income escapement.

Bombay HC nullified reassessm...

 2023 Supreme Court Digest: Indian Penal Code.

2023 Supreme Court Digest: In...

 Bail not granted solely on innocence claim; serious charges require stronger reasons: Supreme Court.

Bail not granted solely on in...

 Rajasthan HC queries police on contempt for breaching Supreme Court rules on commercial arrests

Rajasthan HC queries police o...

J&K High Court: Denying benefits to similar employees violates Articles 14 & 16, equality and non-discrimination.

J&K High Court: Denying benefi...