spinner

Lawyer's apology accepted by Supreme Court in "Advocate Put Mine" case; acknowledges case caused significant embarrassment

Last Updated: 2023-04-15 17:58:38
Lawyer's apology accepted by Supreme Court in

Senior Advocates Mukul Rohatgi, KV Viswanathan and V Mohana informed a Bench of Justices Krishna Murari and Sanjay Karol in the recent case of Ravindra Shah v. State of Maharashtra that the inadvertent mention of a lawyer's name as "Put Mine" on official records was due to an unintentional mistake by the clerk of the lawyer whose name was to appear in the order. The clerk had asked the lawyer on WhatsApp whose name he should add for the appearance slip, and after the lawyer replied "put mine," the clerk mistakenly added the same on the slip.

 

The inadvertent mention of a lawyer's name as "Put Mine" on official records caused the Supreme Court to initiate suo motu proceedings. The Court was investigating the matter after its earlier order stated that "Mr. Put Mine, Advocate" had appeared in the case. Senior Advocates Mukul Rohatgi, KV Viswanathan, and V Mohana informed the Court that the clerk had asked the lawyer whose name to add for the appearance slip, and the lawyer replied with "put mine." However, the clerk mistakenly added the same name on the slip. Based on these facts, the Court concluded that there was no malicious intent on the part of the lawyer, clerk, or court officer.

In its recent ruling, the Supreme Court acknowledged that the misrecording of an advocate's name as "Put Mine" on official records had caused considerable embarrassment to the court, given its wide circulation on social media. However, the court accepted the apology tendered by the Advocate-on-Record, who was a young practitioner, and concluded that there was no malice or ill intent on the part of the lawyer, the clerk, or the court officer. The court further clarified that no further action against any of the parties involved was necessary, as the error was an unintentional mistake and had been duly apologized for. As a result, the court closed proceedings on both the judicial and administrative fronts.

 

 

Click Here to: Download/View Related File

TAGS: Supreme Court lawyer "Put Mine" mistake clerk unintentional mistake no mala fide intention suo motu proceedings embarrassment social media apology no further action.


Latest Posts

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...

Supreme Court Denies Interest on Delayed Pension for

Supreme Court Denies Interest ...