Karnataka High Court Rules: Police Must Register FIR When Complaint Reveals Cognizable Offence

Last Updated: 2023-08-06 13:28:13
Karnataka High Court Rules: Police Must Register FIR When Complaint Reveals Cognizable Offence

"Karnataka High Court Mandates FIR Registration for Complaints Disclosing Cognizable Offences
In a recent landmark ruling by Justice Suraj Govindaraj, a single-judge bench of the Karnataka High Court, police officers are now obligated to promptly register First Information Reports (FIRs) when complaints reveal cognizable offences. The court emphasized that failure to do so constitutes a clear dereliction of duty.

The ruling came in response to the case of Vittal v PSI of Bableshwar PS, where the petitioner lodged a complaint on November 18, 2022, detailing instances of assault, verbal abuse, death threats, and the forcible confiscation of his daughter-in-law's cellphone. These actions, the court noted, fall under punishable offences according to the Indian Penal Code.

Justice Govindaraj, taking the petitioner's grievance into account, directed the police to register an FIR against the accused individuals and initiate a thorough investigation into the matter. The court also stressed the significance of adhering to the guidelines set forth by the Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari's case.

In addition to instructing the Director General of Police to issue comprehensive circulars and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) to all Station House Officers, the court mandated the dissemination of translated versions of the directives in both English and Kannada. Furthermore, the court ordered the provision of complete Kannada-translated copies of the judgment to all Station House Officers.

Advocates Ravichandra Jadhav and Prakash Jadhav represented the petitioner, while Advocate Maya TR represented the respondent."

Click Here to: Download/View Related File

TAGS: Karnataka High Court FIR registration complaints cognizable offences Justice Suraj Govindaraj landmark ruling police officers dereliction of duty Vittal v PSI of Bableshwar PS assault verbal abuse death threats forcible confiscation Indian Penal Code petitioner investigation Lalita Kumari's case Director General of Police circulars Standard Operating Procedures SOPs English Kannada translated versions judgment Advocates Ravichandra Jadhav Prakash Jadhav Advocate Maya TR respondent.


Latest Posts

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...

Supreme Court Denies Interest on Delayed Pension for

Supreme Court Denies Interest ...