spinner

Delhi High Court's Landmark Ruling: Rapido and Uber Bike Taxis Get Green Light, No Coercive Action Allowed

Last Updated: 2023-05-27 10:27:56
Delhi High Court's Landmark Ruling: Rapido and Uber Bike Taxis Get Green Light, No Coercive Action Allowed

The Delhi High Court has issued an order preventing the Delhi government from taking any coercive action against bike taxi aggregators Rapido and Uber until guidelines governing such aggregators are officially notified. This decision was made in response to a petition filed by Rapido, and a similar order was passed regarding Uber's plea.

Parag Maini, a partner at AZB Law Partners, the law firm representing Rapido, has confirmed the development and expressed relief not only for Rapido but also for several bike-taxi operators associated with the company.

Previously, in February, the Delhi government had issued a public notice stating that bike taxis were not allowed in the national capital. According to the notice, two-wheelers with non-transport (private) registration engaging in purely commercial operations would be in violation of the Motor Vehicles Act and related rules. The transport department had warned that app-based aggregators would have to cease their services immediately, or they would face a fine of ₹1 lakh.

Rapido took the matter to court, challenging the notices as well as the constitutional validity of the Delhi Motor Vehicle Rules. The case was argued by Senior Advocate Jayant Mehta, who was supported by the AZB & Partners team consisting of Hardeep Sachdeva, Abhishek Awasthi (Senior Partners), Kamal Shankar, Parag Maini (Partners, Dispute Resolution), and Raghav Chadha, Pradyumna Sharma, Kshitiz Rao (Senior Associates).

It is worth noting that earlier, the Maharashtra government had refused to grant a two-wheeler bike taxi aggregator license to Rapido. The Bombay High Court rejected Rapido's plea challenging this decision, and the company subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court, which also denied relief to Rapido.

TAGS: Delhi High Court bike taxi aggregators Rapido Uber guidelines coercive action Division Bench Suresh Kumar Kait Neena Bansal Krishna petition Delhi government public notice national capital Motor Vehicles Act transport department app-based aggregators challan AZB Law Partners constitutional validity Jayant Mehta Maharashtra government Bombay High Court Supreme Court license.


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...