spinner

Delhi High Court Sends Notice to 26 Political Parties and Election Commission Over PIL Challenging Use of 'INDIA' Name for Opposition Alliance

Last Updated: 2023-08-04 11:18:52
Delhi High Court Sends Notice to 26 Political Parties and Election Commission Over PIL Challenging Use of 'INDIA' Name for Opposition Alliance

Delhi High Court Receives PIL Seeking Restraint on Opposition's Use of 'INDIA' Acronym for Alliance

The Delhi High Court has taken up a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition that calls for restraining opposition parties from using the acronym INDIA (Indian National Developmental Inclusive Alliance) for their alliance. The Division Bench, comprising Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Sanjeev Narula, has issued notice to 26 political parties and the Election Commission of India, seeking their response on the matter. The PIL, filed by activist Girish Bharadwaj through advocate Vaibhav Singh, contends that the use of the name INDIA by opposition parties for their alliance could lead to adverse effects on the peaceful, transparent, and fair casting of votes during the upcoming 2024 general elections. Bharadwaj also argues that such usage is prohibited under Sections 2 and 3 of The Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 1950. The petition highlights statements by prominent leaders like West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee and Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who allegedly linked their alliance name with the nation's name, leading to confusion among the public. The petitioner had initially approached the Election Commission of India with a representation on this matter, but no action was taken, prompting him to seek redress through the court.

TAGS: Delhi High Court PIL INDIA acronym opposition alliance Election Commission activist Girish Bharadwaj advocate Vaibhav Singh general elections 2024 Emblems and Names Act Mamata Banerjee Rahul Gandhi confusion Election Commission of India.


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...