spinner

Bombay High Court Seeks Maharashtra Government's Reply on PIL Challenging Election Freebies

Last Updated: 06-10-2024 02:39:10pm
Bombay High Court Seeks Maharashtra Government's Reply on PIL Challenging Election Freebies

In a significant development, the Bombay High Court has asked the Maharashtra government to respond to a public interest litigation (PIL) challenging the distribution of free gifts by political parties.

 The PIL, filed by a concerned public, expresses concern over the practice of providing free goods and services during elections.

 She argues that this distorts the democratic process and imposes an undue financial burden on the state economy.

 The petitioners argue that distribution of free gifts violates the constitutional principles of equality and fair play as it influences voter behaviour through material incentives rather than politics and governance.

 They argue that such practices, if left unchecked, could divert resources from key areas like health, education and infrastructure development, leading to misuse of public funds.

The Maharashtra government was instructed by the Bombay High Court to present its affidavit and provide an explanation of its position on the matter at the hearing. The court questioned the sustainability of the practice and its compatibility with the constitutional obligation to advance the welfare of all citizens. Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya's panel emphasized the need to draw a clear line between election-season giveaways that could jeopardize democracy and genuine social programs.

The Maharashtra government has been given a deadline to file a response.

 The case touches on a sensitive issue and could set an important precedent for how political parties across India use state resources in their election strategies.

 

 

 

 

Click Here to: Download/View Related File

TAGS: Bombay High Court PIL freebies Maharashtra election promises public funds democracy sustainability.


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...