spinner

Youth Congress Leader Moves High Court to Quash Case, Seeks Stay on Arrest

Last Updated: 28-04-2024 01:10:02pm
Youth Congress Leader Moves High Court to Quash Case, Seeks Stay on Arrest

Youth Congress leader Divyanshu Budhiraja, who is the party’s candidate for Karnal Lok Sabha seat, has moved the Punjab and Haryana High Court for quashing a case registered against him for his alleged failure to appear before the trial court in a criminal case.The matter is likely to be mentioned on April 29 for urgent hearing as Budhiraja has prayed for stay on the First Information Report (FIR) registered under Section 174A of Indian Penal Code and protection from arrest by the Police.Budhiraja is the Haryana Youth Congress President and the party's candidate against former Chief Minister and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Manohar Lal Khattar.In December 2023, Budhiraja had been declared as a proclaimed offender by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Panchkula in a 2018 case under The Haryana Prevention of Defacement of Property Act. Following the trial order, he was booked under Section 174A of IPC.Stating that he had been granted bail by the trial court in the 2018 case that year itself, the Congress leader has said that the CJM in 2022 had dismissed his application for exemption from personal appearance in an arbitrary manner and later also issued non-bailable warrants against him.After the warrants were returned unexecuted as Budhiraja was not residing at the given address, a proclamation was issued against him, the plea states.When he later moved an application for cancellation of the warrant of arrest, the same was dismissed on the ground that he had not been present before the court.“That  on 15.12.2023 the Court gave a finding  that the proclamation issued against  the present petitioner was received back duly executed. The petitioner was declared proclaimed person and the intimation was sent to the concerned court. Copy of the order was sent to the police station Sector 14, Panchkula and the present FIR was registered on the basis of order dated 15.12.2023,” the petition states further.Budhiraja has argued that the warrant of arrest in 2018 case, which is baliable in nature, had been issued directly without first issuing bailable warrants.Further, he has challenged the procedure followed in registration of case against him.“After declaring the petitioner a proclaimed person, if at all the learned Magistrate had desired and  decided to proceed against the petitioner for an offence under Section 174A of IPC, the prescribed course for her was to institute a complaint in writing in the competent jurisdictional Court. Instead of that, the learned trial Court adopted a short but wrong cut and just sent a copy of her orders to the local police for initiation of proceedings under Section 174A against the petitioner (obviously by registration of an FIR) vide order dated 15.12.2023,” the plea states.Thus, Budhiraja has sought quashing of the FIR and stay on further proceedings during the pendency of the petition.Advocates Partap Singh and Harpreet Singh Multani are representing the petitioner.                     

TAGS: Divyanshu Budhiraja Youth Congress leader Punjab and Haryana High Court FIR Section 174A of Indian Penal Code


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...