spinner

Trial Court's Order on December 21 Remanding Azad Stayed by High Court on December 22

Last Updated: 28-12-2023 03:16:06pm
Trial Court's Order on December 21 Remanding Azad Stayed by High Court on December 22

The Delhi High Court on Thursday refused to urgently hear the habeas corpus plea filed by Parliament security breach case accused Neelam Azad.

Advocate Suresh Kumar appeared for Azad and mentioned the plea before the vacation bench of Justices Neena Bansal Krishna and Shalinder Kaur.However, the Bench said that there was no urgency in the matter.

"In any case, it will come up on January 3. There is no urgency," it remarked.

As reported by Bar & Bench on Wednesday, Azad filed a habeas corpus plea seeking immediate release from police custody. She has challenged the legality of the trial court order dated December 21 remanding her to police custody.

Azad contended that she was not allowed to consult legal practitioners of her choice to defend her during the remand proceedings.

“In fact, it was only after the disposal of the remand application that she was asked by the Ld. Court if she wanted to be represented by an advocate of her choice which she replied in affirmative and an order was passed permitting the petitioner to consult her advocate,” Azad stated in her plea.

She said that on December 14, she was produced before the court for the first time, after spending 29 hours in police custody.

Azad was arrested by the Delhi Police on December 13 along with three other accused - Sagar Sharma, Manoranjan D and Amol Shinde.

While Azad and Shinde were protesting outside the Parliament building, Sharma and Manoranjan D entered the Lok Sabha chamber from the visitors' gallery with canisters emitting smoke.

Subsequently, two other accused were also arrested in the case.

On December 21, the trial court had ordered the Delhi Police to share the FIR copy with Azad’s counsel. However, the order was stayed by the High Court on December 22.

TAGS: Delhi High Court Urgent Hearing Neelam Azad Habeas Corpus Plea Vacation Bench No Urgency Next Hearing January 3


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...