spinner

Supreme Court urges informing hit-and-run victims of compensation, considers raising amount.

Last Updated: 15-01-2024 03:56:32pm
 Supreme Court urges informing hit-and-run victims of compensation, considers raising amount.

In response to the dishearteningly low rate of compensation granted under the scheme established by the Central Government for victims of 'hit and run' accidents, the Supreme Court of India has intervened with a series of directives aimed at addressing this critical issue. These directives come in the wake of a comprehensive understanding of the situation, acknowledging the inadequacies of the current compensation framework.

At the heart of this matter is the Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022, crafted by the Central Government in adherence to the stipulations of Section 161 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988. This scheme was designed with the primary objective of providing compensation to individuals who have suffered in the aftermath of hit-and-run accidents—a pervasive and unfortunate occurrence on India's roads.

The Supreme Court's intervention is significant, reflecting its concern over the apparent shortcomings and insufficiencies in the implementation of the compensation scheme. The court, taking cognizance of the dismal rate at which compensation is being granted to victims, has issued a set of directives to rectify the existing issues and streamline the process.

The directives issued by the Supreme Court underscore the urgency and gravity of the situation. They aim not only to address the deficiencies in the compensation mechanism but also to enhance its efficacy. The Court's proactive approach reflects a commitment to ensuring that victims of hit-and-run accidents receive adequate support and restitution.

One key aspect highlighted by the Supreme Court is the need for comprehensive communication with victims about the compensation scheme. Recognizing that many victims may be unaware of the available support, the Court has emphasized the importance of spreading awareness. By mandating the police to inform hit-and-run victims about the compensation scheme, the Court seeks to bridge the gap between the scheme and those who stand to benefit from it.

Additionally, the Supreme Court has expressed concern about the quantum of compensation provided under the existing scheme. This concern has prompted the Court to recommend a reassessment of the compensation amounts. The Court suggests that the Central Government should consider increasing the compensation to better align with the evolving economic landscape and the actual needs of the victims.

The underlying principle of the Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022, is to provide a safety net for those who find themselves in the unfortunate circumstances of being victims of hit-and-run incidents. However, if the compensation offered is insufficient or if the victims are unaware of the support available to them, the very purpose of the scheme is compromised.

The Supreme Court's directives, therefore, serve as a catalyst for positive change. By addressing the communication gap and recommending a reevaluation of compensation amounts, the Court is not merely pointing out flaws but actively engaging in the process of rectification. This judicial intervention is a testament to the Court's commitment to justice and its role in ensuring that the laws and schemes formulated for the welfare of the citizens are not just on paper but are effectively implemented.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court's involvement in rectifying the deficiencies in the Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor Accidents Scheme, 2022, reflects a dedication to justice and an understanding of the real-world impact of legal provisions. The directives issued by the Court signal a positive step towards a more effective and compassionate legal framework for victims of hit-and-run accidents in India.

 

 

 

 

TAGS: Supreme Court Compensation Scheme Hit-and-Run Accidents Central Government Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Directive Scheme Effectiveness Section 161


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...