spinner

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Baljinder Singh

Last Updated: 26-09-2024 01:57:04pm
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Baljinder Singh

Within the later Preeminent Court judgment Baljinder Singh @ Ladoo & Others v. State of Punjab (Criminal Request No. 1389 of 2012), the Court maintained the conviction of the appellants beneath Segment 302 examined with Area 34 of the IPC, related to kill charges. This case highlights the complexities of common purposeful beneath Indian law and how it can frame indeed minutes some time recently a wrongdoing is committed.

 

Case Background:

The appellants were at first indicted beneath Area 302/149 (common question) but contended against the transformation of their charge to Area 302/34 (common deliberate) amid trial. The defense contended that there was no deliberation or common purposeful to commit the wrongdoing, and instead, the occurrence happened within the warm of the minute. 

 

Supreme Court's Observations:

The Court ruled that the transition from Section 149 to Section 34 was valid, as common intention can arise spontaneously. In this case, the appellants acted together in response to a provocation and attacked the victims with weapons, demonstrating a shared intention at the time of the incident. The Court referred to established precedents that show common intention does not require pre-planning and can form instantly.

Furthermore, the Court rejected arguments that a failure of justice had occurred as a result of the conversion of charges. The court can change the accusations without harming the accused as long as they are informed of the allegations against them and given a fair chance to defend themselves.

 

Significance:

According to Section 34 IPC, this ruling emphasizes how crucial it is to comprehend common intention. It clarifies that in joint criminal acts, each participant is liable for the entire offense if they shared a common intention, even if it was formed moments before the crime.

This case emphasizes the Court's commitment to ensuring justice is not derailed by technicalities in charge framing, provided the accused are given a fair trial.

Click Here to: Download/View Related File

TAGS: Baljinder Singh @ Ladoo Supreme Court Criminal Appeal No. 1389 of 2012 Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention common object conviction upheld failure of justice Section 464 CrPC spontaneous common intention joint criminal liability charge conversion fair trial judicial reasoning Indian Penal Code Punjab case criminal law murder case.


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...