spinner

Supreme Court Rejects Stay on ED, CBI Investigation into Abhishek Banerjee in School Jobs Scam; Overturns High Court's ₹25 Lakh Costs

Last Updated: 2023-07-10 15:04:00
Supreme Court Rejects Stay on ED, CBI Investigation into Abhishek Banerjee in School Jobs Scam; Overturns High Court's ₹25 Lakh Costs

The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of the Calcutta High Court to allow the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and Enforcement Directorate (ED) to continue their probe into the West Bengal school jobs for cash scam case involving Abhishek Banerjee, the national general secretary of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITMC). The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the High Court's decision, stating that preventing the investigation at this stage would stifle its progress. However, the Court set aside the ₹25 lakh costs imposed on Banerjee by the High Court, clarifying that it should not be seen as an expression on the merits of the High Court judge's approach.

The Supreme Court bench, comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha, agreed with the High Court's conclusion that it did not have the authority to issue a direction preventing the investigation. The Court emphasized that Banerjee can pursue other remedies, including the option under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), while leaving it open for him to do so.

During the hearing, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Banerjee, argued that there were errors in the order and expressed concerns about the ED's actions based on an allegation made by a judge. Additional Solicitor General SV Raju informed the Court that ₹350 crores had been discovered in the primary school teacher recruitment scam and urged Banerjee to cooperate with the investigation.

The Supreme Court observed that it would not be appropriate to stifle the investigation at this stage, recognizing the ED's independent powers to investigate various aspects of the case. The Court clarified that the High Court's observations would not hinder Banerjee if he chooses to pursue other remedies.

The case originated from a plea by the ED seeking protection from action by the State Police after allegations were made by one of the accused, Kuntal Ghosh, claiming torture and coercion by the agency to implicate Banerjee. Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of the Calcutta High Court had ordered a CBI and ED probe into Banerjee's alleged involvement in the scam. The matter was later transferred to Justice Amrita Sinha, who dismissed Banerjee and Ghosh's applications to recall the order and imposed costs of ₹25 lakh on both of them. Justice Sinha also criticized the slow pace of the investigations by the central agencies in her order.

TAGS: Supreme Court Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Enforcement Directorate (ED) All India Trinamool Congress (AITMC) Abhishek Banerjee West Bengal school jobs for cash scam case probe Calcutta High Court recall order costs Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud Justice PS Narasimha investigation Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi errors in the order Additional Solicitor General SV Raju ₹350 crores primary school teacher recruitment scam cooperation inherent powers Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay Justice Amrita Sinha allegations Kuntal Ghosh slow pace of investigations.


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...