The post of deputy chief minister may not be defined under the Constitution but there is no illegality in appointing senior leaders of the ruling party or a coalition of parties as deputy chief ministers, the Supreme Court observed on Monday, dismissing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that demanded the practice be struck down as being unconstitutional.According to a bench, headed by Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, a deputy CM is a legislator & a minister, called as a deputy CM & therefore, no constitutional provisions are contravened by this practice.“The appointment of deputy chief ministers is a practice followed in some states to give a little more importance to senior leaders in the party or coalition of parties in power...it’s not unconstitutional,” said the bench, which also comprised justices JB Pardiwala & Manoj Misra.Rejecting the PIL moved by Delhi-based Public Political Party, It added that deputy CMs, under the Constitution, are after all just members of the council of ministers headed by the chief minister.The petitioner’s lawyer, on his part, argued that states are setting a wrong example by appointing deputy CMs, which he said was done without there being any foundation in the Constitution. The lawyer added that there is no such officer stipulated in the Constitution, adding such appointments also breach the rule of equality in the council of ministers.But the bench retorted: “A deputy chief minister is first & foremost a minister...The deputy CM doesn’t breach any constitutional provision particularly because someone has to be an MLA. Even ifyou call someone a deputy CM, it is still a reference to a minister.”In its brief order, the court stated: “The petition filed underArticle 32 seeks to challenge the appointment of deputy chief minsters in states. The counsel for the petitioner contends that no such office is there as per the Constitution. A deputy CM is first & foremost a minister in the government of the states. The designation of deputy chief minster does not breach the constitutional position that a chief minister must be elected to the legislative assembly. Therefore, this plea lacks substance & is thus dismissed.”Article 163(1) of the Constitution lays down that there shall be a council of ministers with the chief minister at the head to aid & advise the governor. Article 164(1) outlines the appointment process, with the CM appointed by the governor, & other ministers appointed by the governor on the advice of the CM.While there is no specific provision in the Constitution on deputy CM, in practice, a deputy CM is practically recognised as holding an equivalent status to a cabinet minister in the state & enjoys the same pay & perks as a cabinet minister.Appointing deputy chief ministers has historically represented political compromise in the nation’s politics, particularly following the formation of a coalition government.Currently, 14 out of 28 states have deputy CMs, with Andhra Pradesh leading the pack with five deputy CMs. Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Rajasthan & Uttar Pradesh have two deputy CMs each.
TAGS: Supreme Court PIL Deputy Chief Minister Constitution Practice Chief Justice of India Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud Council of Ministers Political Compromise Coalition Government
