In a critical administering conveyed on October 4, 2024, the Supreme Court vindicated seven people who had been indicted for the kill and kidnapping of Neelam, a lady from Simaltalla, Bihar, in 1985. The case, which had gone through broad case, at last concluded with the Court finding the prosecution's prove deficiently to maintain the feelings.
The appellants, counting Vijay Singh (A6), were denounced of snatching Neelam from her domestic and killing her due to a property debate between her and her in-laws. The case depended intensely on witness declarations, but the Court found a few irregularities in these articulations. In specific, the Incomparable Court addressed the validity of key witnesses, counting the source and relatives of the casualty, and famous the nonattendance of autonomous observers.
In giving the ruling, Justice Satish Chandra Sharma emphasized that the prosecution had not been able to demonstrate that Neelam was living at her father's Simaltalla home at the time of the occurrence. The Court also questioned the accuracy of the chronology and drew attention to differences between the post-mortem report and witness testimony.
Based on insufficient and conflicting evidence, the Court found that the High Court erred in overturning the acquittal of several of the accused. Consequently, the Court ordered the instant release of all seven accused parties, reversing their convictions.
This judgment underscores the significance of clear, reliable prove in criminal cases, especially those including circumstantial confirmation. The Incomparable Court reaffirmed that any questions within the prosecution's case must be settled in favor of the blamed, guaranteeing that feelings are as it were based on undeniable prove.
Click Here to: Download/View Related File
TAGS: Supreme Court Bihar Neelam murder case acquittal witness testimony circumstantial evidence.
