spinner

Madras High Court Directs Central Government to Address Concerns Over Fortified Rice Distribution

Last Updated: 07-05-2024 04:28:24pm
Madras High Court Directs Central Government to Address Concerns Over Fortified Rice Distribution

The Madras High Court has asked the Central Government to look into the apprehensions raised about potential risk factors associated with the consumption of fortified rice distributed through various welfare schemes.Fortified rice is supplied through the Public Distribution System, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Mid-day Meal Scheme, and other welfare schemes of the Government of India in all the States and Union Territories.The division bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice J Sathya Narayana Prasad was dealing with two PILs filed challenging the supply of fortified rice. The PILs were filed by Kanimozhi Manimaran of Tamil Thesiya Periyakkam, an unregistered socio-political movement, and advocate M. Vetri Selvan.The contention of the petitioners was that without scientific study the fortified rice is being distributed through the welfare schemes. They asserted that neither a risk analysis nor a risk assessment had been conducted, and the operational guidelines issued by the Department of Food and Public Distribution, Government of India, for evaluating the provision, coverage, and utilization of fortified rice among the target population had not been followed. Furthermore, they highlighted the absence of any statutory warning mandated by the government.The petitioners underscored that individuals with specific medical conditions should not consume fortified rice. They stressed the importance of conducting an independent, scientific social-cum-medical audit of the pilot scheme for distributing fortified rice before its further expansion.Additionally, the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) stated that there has been no proper medical evaluation conducted on the target population following the implementation of the pilot scheme.Moreover, the court noted that the NITI Aayog report also indicates that the baseline study, which should precede the pilot scheme, has not been carried out.Therefore, court asked the Additional Solicitor General (ASG) appearing for the respondent authorities to take instructions on all these aspects.Court emphasized that the two public interest litigation (PIL) petitions challenging the supply of fortified rice shouldn't be viewed as adversarial litigation."The Central Government shall look into the apprehensions expressed by the petitioners," ordered the court while posting the matter for next hearing on June 19 at the request of ASG.

TAGS: Madras High Court Central Government fortified rice welfare schemes PIL Public Distribution System Integrated Child Development Scheme


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...