spinner

LGBTQ Rights, Long Battle, Equal Rights, 5-Judge Constitution Bench, Queer People

Last Updated: 02-01-2024 01:19:57pm
LGBTQ Rights, Long Battle, Equal Rights, 5-Judge Constitution Bench, Queer People

Reflecting on the unsuccessful fate of the pleas for legal sanction to same-sex marriage before the Supreme Court, CJI D Y Chandrachud said on Monday the outcome of a case is never personal to a judge & he has no regrets.In an exclusive interview with PTI, the 50th Chief Justice of India acknowledged that queer couples fought a "long & hard battle" for realisation of their rights, but judges do not associate themselves with a cause, & having decided the case now, he has left it at that.He said, "I leave it for the future of our society to judge which course to take".

On October 17, a 5-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court refused to grant legal recognition to same-sex marriage but pitched for equal rights to queer people.All judges were unanimous in holding that it was within Parliament's ambit to change the law for validating such union but, in a minority view, CJI Chandrachud & Justice S K Kaul, who recently demitted office, recognised the right of same-sex couples to enter into civil unions.The Chief Justice said, "One thing which our training teaches us is that once you deliver a judgment in a case, you kind of distance yourself from the outcome. Outcomes are never, in that sense, something which are personal to a judge. You decide a case based on your vision of the Constitution, on what you believe the vision of a just society for the future is, in constitutional terms, which is what I have done".

"I never have any regrets. Yes, I have been in the majority in many cases & I have been in a minority in many cases. But the important part about the life of a judge is never to associate yourself with a cause. Because it is only when you don't associate yourself with a cause after a judgment has been delivered that you can truly be dispassionate," he said.

"Having decided a case, I leave it at that. & I leave it for the future of our society to judge what course the society should take," CJI Chandrachud said on being asked if he has any regrets about delivering the judgment.CJI said he would not comment on the merits of the verdict.He said, "The LGBTQ community has fought a long & hard battle in the realisation of their rights. To a certain extent, there was a watershed in that evolution when the Supreme Court decided Navtej Johar (decriminalisation of consensual gay sex). The recent judgement was a judgement where the LGBTQ community sought a recognition of the right to marry. I am not going to comment on the merits of the judgment".Justice S K Kaul, who was part of the top court bench on same-sex marriage issue & recently demitted office, told PTI last week that the case was not strictly legal in nature & involved social issues, & the government may introduce a law in future to grant them matrimonial rights.

TAGS: CJI D Y Chandrachud Same-Sex Marriage Supreme Court Legal Recognition Exclusive Interview


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...