spinner

Justice Abhay S Oka Proposes Criterion for Article 32 Petitions in Supreme Court

Last Updated: 16-04-2024 04:42:23pm
Justice Abhay S Oka Proposes Criterion for Article 32 Petitions in Supreme Court

Justice Abhay S Oka of the Supreme Court, delivering a lecture recently on “Article 32 : History and the Future”, raised a thought-provoking proposition, suggesting the initiation of a discourse among stakeholders to explore the necessity of establishing a criterion for the acceptance of petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India. This article empowers citizens to directly approach the Supreme Court to safeguard their fundamental rights.Justice Oka deliberated on the disparity between individuals, citing instances where affluent petitioners with formidable legal teams invoke Article 19(1)(g), contrasting with common convicts. This prompted him to ponder “Should there be some test laid down which say that only if these tests are adhered to then article 32 can be invoked?”Acknowledging the influx of such cases inundating the Supreme Court, Justice Oka highlighted the court's tendency to redirect many petitioners to the respective High Courts due to the overwhelming volume. He emphasised the adverse impact of high case pendency, which impedes the Court's ability to entertain all petitions efficiently. “Some may argue that SC should entertain all article 32 plea without sending them to high court. But we are not living in an ideal world and if there was no pendency of cases then the scene would have been different. There are 80,000 cases pending in SC. We are not only a constitutional court but also an appellate court,” Justice Oka said.Speaking at the Ambedkar Memorial Lecture, Justice Oka advocated for open discussions on constitutional matters and welcomed constructive critique of the judiciary. He underscored the pressing need for dialogue on the effective enforcement of fundamental rights by the Court.Regarding the proposal for a specialised Bench to handle such cases, Justice Oka deferred to the Chief Justice of India, saying “This question has to be before the master of roster and no one else.”Responding to queries about establishing a standardised approach for personal liberty petitions, Justice Oka embraced the diversity of judicial perspectives within the Bench. He emphasised the dynamic nature of legal interpretation, contrasting it with the certainties of mathematics. He said, “We need such diversity when it comes to judicial views. AK Gopalan was corrected, and ADM Jabalpur too was corrected. And today we say something and later it can be corrected.”“We must invite a debate on the enforcement of fundamental rights by our court and how far have we been successful in this,” Justice Oka said concluding his address.

TAGS: Justice Abhay S Oka Supreme Court Article 32 fundamental rights criteria


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...