spinner

Delhi High Court Takes Exception to Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh's Plea to Quash Sexual Harassment Trial

Last Updated: 29-08-2024 04:59:11pm
Delhi High Court Takes Exception to Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh's Plea to Quash Sexual Harassment Trial

On Admirable 29, 2024, the Delhi Tall Court raised concerns over a supplication recorded by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) pioneer and previous Wrestling League of India (WFI) president, Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh. Singh looked for the subduing of the sexual badgering case started against him by numerous ladies wrestlers, as well as the subduing of the Primary Data Report (FIR) and the trial court's arrange that surrounded charges against him. 

High Court's Initial Observations

Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, who presided over the hearing, remarked that the plea appeared to be an attempt to quash the entire proceedings after the trial had already commenced. The Court noted, "There can’t be an omnibus order on everything. If you wanted to quash the order on charge you could have come. Once the trial has started, this is nothing but an oblique way."

This observation highlighted the Court's skepticism about the timing and intent behind Singh's petition. The Court questioned why Singh chose to challenge both the charges and the trial proceedings in a single plea, suggesting that it might be a strategic move to derail the ongoing trial.

Arguments from Both Sides

Advocate Rajiv Mohan, representing Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, argued that the entire case against his client was based on a "hidden agenda," claiming that the complainant wrestlers aimed to remove Singh from his position as the WFI President. Mohan emphasized that the charges were driven by ulterior motives rather than genuine grievances.

Background of the Case

Accusations of sexual harassment and offending the modesty of five women wrestlers are part of the charges against Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh. The accusations involve crimes listed in Sections 354 (disrespecting modesty), 354A (making sexually suggestive remarks), 354D (following someone), and 506(1) (making threats) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Furthermore, a young wrestler originally made allegations against Singh under the POCSO Act, but later retracted her complaint, prompting the Delhi Police to submit a cancellation report.

On June 15, 2023, Singh was charged by the police according to these accusations. The trial court determined that there was enough evidence in the records to establish charges, including those related to criminal intimidation under Section 506(1) of the IPC, against two wrestlers.


Next Steps

In spite of its concerns, the Delhi Tall Court has not rejected Singh's supplication through and through. Instep, the Court has inquired Singh's guide to get ready a brief note inside two weeks, enumerating the particular grounds for suppress the trial procedures. The matter has been posted for encourage thought on September 26, 2024.

As the legitimate fight proceeds, the case remains a noteworthy minute within the continuous talk encompassing sexual badgering in Indian sports and the responsibility of those in positions of control. The Delhi Tall Court's cautious investigation of Singh's supplication underscores the judiciary's part in ensuring that equity isn't deterred by key lawful maneuvers. 

TAGS: Delhi High Court BJP leader Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh sexual harassment women wrestlers First Information Report (FIR) trial court's order charges Advocate Rajiv Mohan WFI President Delhi Police outraging the modesty Indian Penal Code (IPC) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act) chargesheet and criminal intimidation.


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...