spinner

Delhi High Court Grants Bail, Criticizes Prolonged Pre-trial Imprisonment in Kidnapping Case

Last Updated: 18-04-2024 04:17:53pm
Delhi High Court Grants Bail, Criticizes Prolonged Pre-trial Imprisonment in Kidnapping Case

The Delhi High Court has observed that imprisonment at the stage of trial cannot be prolonged only for the purpose of “teaching the accused a lesson”, as it granted bail to an accused in a kidnapping case.“A person who has not been convicted should only be kept in custody if there is a possibility that he or she might abscond or tamper with evidence or threaten the witness. Merely because the offence is of a serious nature cannot be the ground to curtail the personal liberty of an undertrial for an indefinite period,” Justice Vikas Mahajan noted.The case was based on a complaint by woman on September 3, 2020, at the New Ashok Nagar police station, stating that her daughter had gone missing after going to a bank in Noida.Later that day, the victim’s father told the police that the kidnappers had called him and threatened to kill his daughter unless he paid a ransom of ₹40 lakh.The police immediately traced the kidnappers to Noida’s Chhalera village and the next day, a team rescued the victim as well as arrested the accused, Simpal Srivastav and Shah Alam, from the spot.In its order on June 7, the High Court noted that the chargesheet in the case has already been filed and no recovery needs to be made from the accused Shah Alam, who has been in custody since September 4, 2020.Justice Mahajan said the examination-in-chief of the victim has already been recorded and since there are 23 witnesses, it will take a long time to conclude the trial.Mr. Alam’s counsel argued that his client is a young man about 26 years of age and had no criminal antecedents, adding that he comes from a very poor family and has been in prison for a long time.While the prosecution opposed the bail plea, the High Court remarked, “From time to time, necessity demands that some unconvicted persons should be held in custody pending trial to secure their attendance at the trial but in such cases, ‘necessity’ is the operative test.”The judge noted that “one must not lose sight of the fact that any imprisonment before conviction has a substantial punitive content”.

TAGS: Delhi High Court bail kidnapping case undertrial pre-trial imprisonment personal liberty Justice Vikas Mahajan


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...