spinner

Delhi Court Denies Bail to UAPA Case Accused, Rejects Parity Claim"

Last Updated: 23-02-2024 04:05:43pm
Delhi Court Denies Bail to UAPA Case Accused, Rejects Parity Claim

On Thursday, a Court in Delhi rejected the bail plea of an accused charged in the UAPA case related to the alleged conspiracy behind the 2020 northeast Delhi communal riots, saying he could not claim parity with three other co-accused.Additional Sessions Judge Sameer Bajpai was hearing the regular bail application of accused Tasleem Ahmed.The court noted that Ahmed sought parity with the co-accused, Devangana Kalita, Natasha Narwal & Asif Iqbal Tanha who had been granted bail by the Delhi High Court on June 15, 2021.It further noted the submissions of Ahmed’s counsel, saying according to the chargesheet, the role of his client & the three other co-accused was similar.The Court said that the high court had granted relief to Kalita, Narwal & Tanha after observing that the allegations against them under UAPA provisions were prima facie not true.It said, “The opinion of the high court is with respect to the co-accused persons only & is not general and, therefore, cannot be considered for any other accused, including the applicant (Ahmed).” The court underscored that the predecessor court (under the previous judge) had rejected Ahmed’s bail plea in March 2022, observing that for the purpose of bail, there were reasonable grounds for believing that the accusations against Ahmed were prima facie true.

The UAPA provision created an embargo against granting bail to such persons, the Court noted.

It said, “Surprisingly, the said order of the predecessor order has not been challenged by the applicant & this court now cannot review its own order & give any contrary opinion".

 

Dismissing the plea, the court said, “the desired relief cannot be granted to the applicant on the ground of parity with the other co-accused persons.” Twenty people including activists Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid, Khalid Saifi & former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain, have been booked for their alleged involvement in the larger conspiracy to incite the riots.

The case is being investigated by the Special Cell of Delhi Police. 

TAGS: Delhi Court Bail plea UAPA case Accused Parity Denies Rejects Chargesheet Counsel Prima facie Embargo Review Activists Special Cell Delhi Police.


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...