spinner

Court Suggests Time Lag for Live Telecast to Address Blackout Concerns

Last Updated: 24-01-2024 04:08:33pm
Court Suggests Time Lag for Live Telecast to Address Blackout Concerns

The Madras High Court Tuesday asked the Tamil Nadu government to consider live telecast of State Assembly proceedings.A bench of Chief Justice SV Gangapurwala and Justice D Bharatha Chakravarthy also suggested that if live telecast of such proceedings was not possible, the State could consider telecasting the same with a “time lag of five to ten minutes, after expunging” any objectionable comments or conduct.The bench directed Advocate General PS Raman to get instructions on the same by March 11, the next date of hearing.The Court was hearing two public interest litigation (PIL) petitions filed in 2012 and 2015 by two regional parties from the State seeking live telecast of the TN Assembly proceedings.Last year, AIADMK leader SP Velumani had also demanded such live telecast and was impleaded as a party in the matter.On Tuesday, Raman told the Court that at present, the question hour and the call attention motion proceedings are already being streamed.The entire proceedings are not streamed live yet because, because sometimes, the speaker of the house expunges unparliamentary remarks from the records, Raman said.Senior Counsel Vijay Narayan, who appeared for Velumani, told the Court that often, issues raised by opposition members were being “blacked out” in such telecast of the Assembly proceedings.The Court then suggested streaming of the proceedings with a time lag.“Besides, if a member makes such remarks, it will only go against him. If you don’t want such remarks to go public, then delay the streaming by five to 10 minutes. When the parliamentary proceedings are telecast live, what is the problem in the Legislative Assembly proceedings?” the High Court said.

TAGS: TN High Court live telecast Assembly proceedings PIL petitions 2012 2015 regional parties A


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...