spinner

Bombay High Court Rejects MHADA's Plea for 40-Storey Building Near Mumbai Airport

Last Updated: 16-01-2024 02:24:10pm
Bombay High Court Rejects MHADA's Plea for 40-Storey Building Near Mumbai Airport

The Bombay High Court recently dismissed a petition filed by the Maharashtra Housing Development Authority (MHADA) seeking approval to construct a 40-storey residential building within 3 kilometres of the Mumbai International Airport.The division bench of the high court, consisting of Justice GS Patel and Justice Kamal Khata, stated that civil aviation norms cannot be relaxed for a public authority.“No relaxation of civil aviation safety norms can be granted only because the project proponent is a public authority. Aviation safety has nothing at all to do with the identity of the development,” the order reads.

MHADA had filed a petition against the Ministry of Defence's decision to deny permission for the construction of a high-rise building near Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport.MHADA had proposed a 115.54-meter-tall building, exceeding the maximum permissible height of 58.48 meters for low-income housing, accommodating 560 tenants.MHADA had initially appealed the Ministry's decision, and the appellate authority subsequently granted permission for a reduced height of 96.68 meters.The division bench said that “one that paints quite a startling picture, of aircraft at the CSMIA weaving and swooping around an oversized MHADA tower as they take off or land,” the bench said.The high court further said that it would have insisted on the Airport Authority of India prescribing a much lower height“Left to ourselves, we would have insisted on the Airport Authority of India prescribing a much lower height. MHADA is not being selectively targeted for the height restriction. If anything, it is the other way around. We trust the Appellate Authority is aware that if it permits a relaxation to MHADA, it will be required to permit that very relaxation to every other applicant or developer, including a private developer,” the order reads.The division bench also observed that there are no exemptions merely because these are middle-income group housing schemes or because the applicant is MHADA.

Case title: Maharashtra Housing And Area Development Authority vs AAI & Anr

TAGS: Bombay High Court MHADA Mumbai Airport High-rise Building Aviation Safety Norms


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...