spinner

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Rajendra Singh's Plea Against State of UP

Last Updated: 06-09-2024 01:29:06pm
Allahabad High Court Dismisses Rajendra Singh's Plea Against State of UP

On September 5, 2024, the Allahabad Tall Court, Lucknow Seat, rejected a appeal recorded by Daya Shanker Pathak beneath Article 227 of the Structure, looking for an sped up choice on a case pending some time recently the Uttar Pradesh Open Benefit Tribunal. The applicant had drawn closer the court looking for quick transfer of his case, which related to a punishment arrange issued in 2022. In any case, the court found no compelling reason to meddled and rejected the request as without justify.

Background 

The solicitor, Daya Shanker Pathak, recorded a summons request beneath Article 227 of the Structure of India, asking the Tall Court to coordinate the Uttar Pradesh Open Benefit Tribunal to speed up the choice in his case. His case, recorded some time recently the tribunal in 2022, challenged a punishment arrange forced by the specialists. The solicitor contended that the delay in choosing the matter was unjustified and asked the court to intercede for faster determination. 

Court’s Observations

Justice Subhash Vidyarthi presided over the matter and provided a detailed examination of the issues raised by the petitioner. The court observed that while the petitioner sought to expedite administrative processes, there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the state authorities had acted unlawfully or had intentionally caused delays. 

Judgment 

The petition was dismissed by the Allahabad High Court on the grounds that it was without merit. It was declared by the court that "the petition is without substance and stands dismissed." Justice Vidyarthi's ruling further clarified that the petitioner had failed to demonstrate any clear legal violation by the state that warranted court intervention.

Conclusion

This case underscores the principle that higher courts are generally reluctant to interfere with administrative proceedings unless there is concrete evidence of misconduct or intentional delays. The Allahabad High Court’s decision reflects its commitment to ensuring that judicial resources are applied only in cases where there is a clear violation of legal or constitutional rights.

 

Click Here to: Download/View Related File

TAGS: Allahabad High Court Rajendra Singh State of Uttar Pradesh Article 227 administrative delays statutory duties judicial intervention court ruling case dismissal


Latest Posts

Karnataka High Court Upholds BDA Land Acquisition, Dismisses Petition Filed 53 Years Later

Karnataka High Court Upholds B...

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoners' Right to Legal Aid in Landmark Ruling

Supreme Court Upholds Prisoner...

Supreme Court’s Verdict in Lalta Prasad Vaish & Sons vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Supreme Court’s Verdict in L...

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Structure for Artificers in Indian Navy

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Stru...

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against HDFC Bank in Locker Operation Dispute

Supreme Court Quashes FIR Agai...

Supreme Court Ruling on Corporate Insolvency Proceedings: Vidyasagar Prasad vs UCO Bank

Supreme Court Ruling on Corpor...

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashodeep Bisanrao Vadode's Criminal Appeal

Supreme Court Ruling on Yashod...

Supreme Court Resolves Lease Dispute between Central Warehousing Corporation and Sidhartha Tiles

Supreme Court Resolves Lease D...