On September 5, 2024, the Allahabad Tall Court, Lucknow Seat, rejected a appeal recorded by Daya Shanker Pathak beneath Article 227 of the Structure, looking for an sped up choice on a case pending some time recently the Uttar Pradesh Open Benefit Tribunal. The applicant had drawn closer the court looking for quick transfer of his case, which related to a punishment arrange issued in 2022. In any case, the court found no compelling reason to meddled and rejected the request as without justify.
Background
The solicitor, Daya Shanker Pathak, recorded a summons request beneath Article 227 of the Structure of India, asking the Tall Court to coordinate the Uttar Pradesh Open Benefit Tribunal to speed up the choice in his case. His case, recorded some time recently the tribunal in 2022, challenged a punishment arrange forced by the specialists. The solicitor contended that the delay in choosing the matter was unjustified and asked the court to intercede for faster determination.
Court's Findings
Following hearing arguments from both sides, Justice Subhash Vidyarthi concluded that the court lacked a legitimate reason to intervene in the tribunal's operations. The petitioner's case has already been heard, the court noted, and "the decision-making process is underway." The court commented, "There is no indication that the Tribunal is failing in its duty to expedite the matter appropriately."
Conclusion
The Allahabad Tall Court expelled the appeal as unmerited, expressing that "the request needs justify and is in like manner expelled." The court's administering emphasizes the rule that higher courts ought to not meddled with progressing tribunal procedures unless there's clear prove of fumble or pointless delay.
Click Here to: Download/View Related File
TAGS: Allahabad High Court Article 227 Daya Shanker Pathak Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal tribunal proceedings penalty order writ petition case dismissal.
